WebThe argument from inconsistent revelations. The argument from inconsistent revelations, also known as the avoiding the wrong hell problem, is an argument against the existence of God. It asserts that it is unlikely that God exists because many theologians and faithful adherents have produced conflicting and mutually exclusive revelations. Web1 day ago · SLED opened a homicide investigation into Smith’s death shortly after the savage slayings of 52-year-old Maggie Murdaugh and 22-year-old Paul Murdaugh on June 7, 2024 at Moselle – a 1,700-acre...
Dodgers’ self-critical Mookie Betts not happy with ‘inconsistent’ …
WebThe argument from inconsistent revelations, also known as the avoiding the wrong hell problem, is an argument against the existence of God. It asserts that it is unlikely that God … WebJan 4, 2024 · For example, there is the argument from inconsistent revelations. This argument critiques Pascal’s Wager on the basis that there is no reason to limit the choices to the Christian God. Since there have been many religions throughout human history, there can be many potential gods. Another critique comes from atheist circles. birkenhead bus station stands
Why do atheists think that Christianity is false? - Quora
WebA counter-argument to the Argument from miracles is the Argument from inconsistent revelations, which states that multiple incompatible miracles are alleged to have occurred which provide evidence for different religions. Not all these can be correct. WebThe Argument from inconsistent revelations (also known as Avoiding the wrong hell problem) is an argument that says that God probably does not exist. There are many … WebKJV has for Revelation 13:10. He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints. The passage has a justice/retribution moral similar to that of Mt 26:52. In NIV the moral is instead about suffering patiently and accepting one's fate. dancing line the desert