WebApr 10, 2024 · Section 271C of the I-T Act deals with penalties for failure to deduct/remit TDS or remit. It provides for a minimum penalty, which is 100 per cent of the amount of tax evaded plus the amount of tax payable, while the maximum penalty goes up to 300 per cent. WebJan 24, 2024 · Section 271C of the IT Act provides that if any person fails to deduct the whole or part of the tax as required in terms of the Act, then such person shall be liable to …
Supreme Court holds Section 271C penalty inapplicable …
WebApr 10, 2024 · The Supreme Court on Monday held that penalty is inapplicable on belated deposit of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under the Section 271C of the Income Tax Act. WebNote : No penalty is imposable for any failure under sections 271 (1) ( b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA, 271BB, 271C, 271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FAB , 271FB, 271G, 271GA , 271GB , 271H, 271-I , 272A (1) ( c) or ( d ), 272A (2), 272AA (1), 272B, 272BB (1), 272BB (1A), 272BBB (1), 273 (1) (b), 273 (2) (b) and 273 (2) (c) if the person or … how many references for 1500 words
Mere Delay In Remittance Of TDS Doesn’t Attract Penalty Under S 271C …
WebApr 10, 2024 · New Delhi: The Supreme Court Monday held that no penalty shall be leviable under section 271C of the Income Tax Act over mere belated remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS) after its ... WebWith effect from assessment year 2015-16 a new section 271FAA has been inserted to provide for a penalty of Rs. 50,000 for furnishing inaccurate statement of financial transaction or reportable account in certain cases. 3. With effect from 1-10-2014 TPO can also levy penalty. 4. WebApr 11, 2024 · Pareshbhai Harshadbhai Gohel Vs DCIT (ITAT Surat) ITAT Surat held that penalty under section 271 (1) (b) of the Income Tax Act not leviable merely because the assesse couldn’t make compliance due to some bonafide reasons. Facts- AO initiated and levied penalty u/s. 271 (1) (b) of Rs. 10,000/- vide his order dated 20/01/2024. AO while … how deep to countersink